About Me

Name: Scatbug
Email: jackegel@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

The varying degrees of a world on fire

Now that Barack Obama has turned on his spiritual mentor for turning on him, let us turn our attention back to the distinguished professor of education, and sometime Obama dinner companion, William Ayers. While it seems obvious to heap mounds of scorn on the Agent of Change for his past associations with clowns like Ayers, it can be helpful on occasion to receive a firm whack between the eyes with a 2x4 to drive home the full scope of Obama's moral and intellectual failings in this regard.

The story below provides just the right piece of lumber for the job. I've clipped large portions of it, but of course go to City Journal and read the whole thing. And then please try to exersise restraint when you encounter Obama supporters in public (as identified by the glow of Righteousness about them).

Fire in the Night, by John Murtagh

During the April 16 debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, moderator George Stephanopoulos brought up “a gentleman named William Ayers,” who “was part of the Weather Underground in the 1970s. They bombed the Pentagon, the Capitol, and other buildings. He’s never apologized for that.” Stephanopoulos then asked Obama to explain his relationship with Ayers. Obama’s answer: “The notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was eight years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn’t make much sense, George.” Obama was indeed only eight in early 1970. I was only nine then, the year Ayers’s Weathermen tried to murder me.

In February 1970, my father, a New York State Supreme Court justice, was presiding over the trial of the so-called “Panther 21,” members of the Black Panther Party indicted in a plot to bomb New York landmarks and department stores. Early on the morning of February 21, as my family slept, three gasoline-filled firebombs exploded at our home on the northern tip of Manhattan, two at the front door and the third tucked neatly under the gas tank of the family car. (Today, of course, we’d call that a car bomb.)

I still recall, as though it were a dream, thinking that someone was lifting and dropping my bed as the explosions jolted me awake, and I remember my mother’s pulling me from the tangle of sheets and running to the kitchen where my father stood. Through the large windows overlooking the yard, all we could see was the bright glow of flames below. We didn’t leave our burning house for fear of who might be waiting outside. The same night, bombs were thrown at a police car in Manhattan and two military recruiting stations in Brooklyn. Sunlight, the next morning, revealed three sentences of blood-red graffiti on our sidewalk: FREE THE PANTHER 21; THE VIET CONG HAVE WON; KILL THE PIGS.

For the next 18 months, I went to school in an unmarked police car. My mother, a schoolteacher, had plainclothes detectives waiting in the faculty lounge all day. My brother saved a few bucks because he didn’t have to rent a limo for the senior prom: the NYPD did the driving. We all made the best of the odd new life that had been thrust upon us, but for years, the sound of a fire truck’s siren made my stomach knot and my heart race. In many ways, the enormity of the attempt to kill my entire family didn’t fully hit me until years later, when, a father myself, I was tucking my own nine-year-old John Murtagh into bed.

Mr. Murtagh concludes this powerful story with a profound parallel:

Though never a supporter of Obama, I admired him for a time for his ability to engage our imaginations, and especially for his ability to inspire the young once again to embrace the political system. Yet his myopia in the last few months has cast a new light on his “politics of change.” Nobody should hold the junior senator from Illinois responsible for his friends’ and supporters’ violent terrorist acts. But it is fair to hold him responsible for a startling lack of judgment in his choice of mentors, associates, and friends, and for showing a callous disregard for the lives they damaged and the hatred they have demonstrated for this country. It is fair, too, to ask what those choices say about Obama’s own beliefs, his philosophy, and the direction he would take our nation.

At the conclusion of his 2001 Times interview, Ayers said of his upbringing and subsequent radicalization: “I was a child of privilege and I woke up to a world on fire.”

Funny thing, Bill: one night, so did I.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hope is where you find it

News from Guantanamo, via the AP:
Bin Laden driver wants to boycott trial at Guantanamo

Osama bin Laden's former driver has become the latest detainee at Guantanamo Bay to refuse to participate in his war-crimes trial.
 
The case against Salim Ahmed Hamdan of Yemen is scheduled to be the first to reach trial at the U.S. Navy base in southeast Cuba next month. But his decision to boycott could prolong a process already delayed by legal challenges.
 
At a pretrial hearing Monday, Hamdan said he would not participate in the trial and he does not want the help of his defense lawyers. He said he felt no hope of justice after more than six years in confinement.
 
The judge, Navy Capt. Keith Allred, tried to persuade Hamdan to reconsider and ordered a recess without consulting the detainee further.
Perhaps tonight, while thumbing through his personal Koran and finishing his halal evening meal, Mr. Hamdan might recognize a few signs of hope, such as: 1) He has been afforded a trial and a presumption of innocence (ahem); 2) American defense attorneys are working tirelessly and sincerely on his behalf;  and 3) The presiding judge, upon being informed of the "boycott", did not say: "Fine by me. Escort the prisoner out behind the dumpster and take his head off. I'm already late for my tee time. Oh, and sergeant? Requisition some AV equipment for this one."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More on the "other reverend"

I have a simple request. If anyone can find a paragraph from a political news story today more hilarious than the one below, please forward the link so that I can tell you you're wrong. From FoxNews:
Rev. Al Sharpton accused Barack Obama of trying to “grandstand in front of white people” by suggesting that New Yorkers should not get violent over the acquittal of three police officers who shot an unarmed man last year, sources told The New York Post.
Alright. See if you can top it.
 
Hey Obama! Stop grandstanding!
 
An aide to Al Sharpton on Tuesday denied a report that the reverend accused Barack Obama of trying to “grandstand in front of white people” by suggesting that New Yorkers should not get violent over the acquittal of three police officers who shot an unarmed man last year.
 
The story, which appeared in Tuesday’s New York Post, is an “outright falsehood,” said Charlie King, acting national director of Sharpton’s National Action Network.
 
“Everything stated in the New York Post regarding yesterday’s conversation between Senator Obama and Reverend Sharpton is false, and is either a fabrication of the Post journalists who wrote the story or the supposed unnamed source for the story. In my view, there is a big difference between tabloid journalism and shoddy journalism. This story is clearly the latter and is unacceptable,” King said.
And the country sits on pins and needles waiting for this story to be settled. Meanwhile, the following quote from Mr. King will no doubt go unremarked upon:
"For the record, Reverend Sharpton and Senator Obama had a good conversation yesterday about the need to address both police misconduct and reducing crime. As with the numerous conversations they have, it was friendly, respectful and substantive. "
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another controversial figure?

The Reverend Al Sharpton has entered the news to once again fight for social justice:
Sharpton Promises to 'Close This City' After Officer Acquittals

NEW YORK (AP) —  Hundreds of angry people marched through Harlem on Saturday after the Rev. Al Sharpton promised to "close this city down" to protest the acquittals of three police detectives in the 50-shot barrage that killed a groom on his wedding day and wounded two friends.

"We strategically know how to stop the city so people stand still and realize that you do not have the right to shoot down unarmed, innocent civilians," Sharpton told an overflow crowd of several hundred people at his National Action Network office in the historically black Manhattan neighborhood. "This city is going to deal with the blood of Sean Bell."

Sharpton was joined by the family of 23-year-old Sean Bell - a black man - and a friend of Bell who was wounded in the 2006 shooting outside a Queens strip club. Two of the three officers charged were also black.

The rally at Sharpton's office was followed by a 20-block march down Malcolm X Boulevard and then across 125th Street, Harlem's main business thoroughfare, where some bystanders yelled out "Kill the police!"
Surprisingly, some consider this type of thing controversial and view Rev. Sharpton as a polarizing figure. But indeed, the New York City religious leader and activist has been involved in similar, and even more volatile, incidents in the past. What's more, in a typical scoop by your intrepid investigative blogger, I have unearthed irrefutable proof that Senator Barack Obama has had more than friendly relations with Sharpton over the years. What this means remains to be determined, I suppose. But seeking clarification and perhaps appropriate context, I e-mailed photos of the two men to the Obama campaign along with questions asking the Senator about specific incidents in Sharpton's past. The answers were brief and are included below:

I was only 26 years old when that Brawley thing happened.
 


I was only 30 years old when that Crown Heights Riot thing happened.


I was only 34 when that Freddy's Fashion Mart thing happened.
 
 
 
I was only...Wait. Wasn't that just yesterday?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Digs the Corps

That sound you just heard? 'Twas nothing but thousands of active and retired Marines throwing up.


Here's the story,  if you even care.

However, imagine with me the telephone conversation made to secure that t-shirt:
______________________________

Um, hi...This is Allie Jenkins. I'm with the Barack Obama campaign? Do you...um...sell...you know, military t-shirts?

Cool...I'm looking for one that has the letters U. S. M. C. Do you have something like that?

You do? Excellent. And if you don't mind, my boss, like, totally threw this task at me at the last minute. So I don't even know...What does, or...um...do those letters stand for?

[Gasp] Really?? Wow. That's like totally...wow. Well, anyway...What about colors?

That's it? Just gray? My boss said something earth tone, or sky blue...

Oh. I see. At least it won't clash, I guess. Okay...One last thing. What about the material? We'd like to get something made from fair trade organic hemp if possible.

Bummer...But do you know anything about the factory in Bangladesh?

Why are you laughing?

Oh. [giggle] Right...Everything's a cause...psst! [whisper] Don't tell anyone I said that.

[giggle] You're very cool for a dude who sells military stuff.

[giggle] That one was like totally over my head. I guess I should google 'howitzer' when I get a chance.  Anyway...It is like so past the start of happy hour. I guess I'll go ahead and take the gray in an extra-large.

Wha...? Just one is fine. I can't imagine the Senator needing any spares.

Hmm? Oh...We're heading to the Stagger Inn. Do you know it?

Cool. We'll be there about 6ish. So absolutely...Drop by.

Sure. Uh...Let's see. I have brown hair and will be wearing...

How'd you guess? It's pink tie-dyed, and his head is like this cool rain foresty green. The back has "Endless Revolution" printed in this really cool, like, old school commie font.

The back? Oh...I guess it's just...you know...a figure of speech, or something...So I'll see you there?

Rockin'. And yeah, bring the shirt. But don't wear one!!

[giggle] No, you pervo! I meant a USMC one!...Anyway, just my lame-o sense of humor.

[giggle] Right...I'm much funnier in person. Smartass [giggle]...So you're thinking 7:00 or so?

Cool. Yeah, me too. We'll see you then.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »